Mineral County Public Surveys
Mineral County National Honor Society Students Complete the Yucca Mountain 2011 Survey

Mineral-Survey-2011
Public opinion surveys conducted by the State of Nevada (most recently 2006) suggest that roughly 70 percent of Nevada residents would vote against a repository if they actually had a chance to vote on the project. The State survey results primarily reflect the opinions of Clark County residents. The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) has sponsored a number of public opinion surveys, the most recent in 2010. Their results show there is a consensus among Americans that nuclear energy will play an important role in meeting the nation's electricity needs in the years ahead. According to two March 2010 national public opinion surveys conducted for NEI, 86 percent of the public and 88 percent of college graduate voters agree that nuclear energy will play an important role in meeting future electricity demand. Majorities also support license renewal for existing nuclear power plants and "definitely building" new nuclear power plants.
The characterization of Yucca Mountain as a potential site for the first high-level nuclear repository is opposed by the State of Nevada. Responses to surveys conducted by the State of Nevada (most recently 2006) suggest that roughly 70 percent of Nevada residents would vote against a repository if they actually had a chance to vote on the project.
The State survey was intended to represent the views of the State in general, but provides little or no insight about the opinions and beliefs held by Mineral County residents with respect to the repository program.
As part of its impact assessment and oversight program, in 2003 Mineral County initiated an annual survey focused on assessing local Mineral County residence opinions about the Yucca Mountain Project and nuclear power. Survey questions were directly related to the Yucca Mountain project and more generally related to nuclear energy, and transportation of nuclear waste to Yucca Mountain. Several of the questions used in this year's survey were the same as those used by NEI in their national public survey, concentrated on nuclear waste and nuclear energy. Additionally, survey questions #2 and #3 were changed to focus on the Yucca Mountain licensing process.
|
Mineral County National Honor Society Students Complete the Yucca Mountain 2010 Survey
The Mineral County National Honor Society have completed the Yucca Mountain 2010 Community Survey with results that coincide with prior surveys of local county residents (see figure below).
The high school students interviewed approximately 200 respondents in order to ascertain the views and knowledge of the proposed Yucca Mountain High Level Nuclear Waste Repository 90 miles north of Las Vegas. The survey also included questions which have been the subject of national survey efforts regarding nuclear energy.
On Wednesday, April 21st, 2010, 3 students from the survey group, Nicole West, Gabby Madraso and Sara Going, presented the results to the Mineral County Board of Commissioners.
The students worked under the direction of Linda Mathias, Director of the Mineral County Nuclear Projects Office and their faculty advisor, Shar Murphy. The National Honor Society student participants were: Mallory Bunch, Sheridan Sterling, Christina Janis, Sara Going, Candace Paulson, Nicole West, Sam Mayes, Chris Milks, Dalton Hearn, Foster Kenton III, Shatoya Mitchel and Gabby Madraso.
A heartfelt thank you goes out to these fine students and their faculty advisor, Shar Murphy for a job well done! Public Survey 2010:
Student presenters are Nicole West, Gabby Madraso and Sara Going
sample question from the 2010 Survey
3.0 COMPARISON OF SURVEY RESPONSES
Section 3.0 compares the results of the 2010 Mineral County survey to national survey responses and past community surveys. The Nuclear Energy Institute conducted a number of survey efforts related to Yucca Mountain and nuclear energy use over the last several years. Among national and Mineral County survey respondents, support for nuclear power remains strong.
Question:
Do you strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose the use of nuclear energy as one of the ways to provide electricity in the United States?
Questions:
Do you strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose the use of nuclear energy as one of the ways to provide electricity in the United States?
As compared to national survey results, the Mineral County 2007 survey respondents had a slightly less favorable view of nuclear energy as a source of electricity in the United States. Overall, there is an increasing favorable view of nuclear energy among national and Mineral County survey respondents for the 2008 and 2009 survey efforts. 
|
2009 Mineral County Public Survey
Report
|
|
Mineral County High School students completed approximately 209 surveys in order to ascertain the views and knowledge of the repository program and nuclear energy. The Mineral County Community survey focused on questions and issues that have been the subject of national survey efforts related to nuclear energy and Yucca Mountain.
Once the research was completed students compiled the information and presented their findings to the Mineral County Board of County Commissioners.
How did Mineral residents respond?
|

High School students right to left Devin Loughry, Brianna Paulson, and Nicole Mathias.
Click on graphic to see larger view.
|
Question: Are you familiar with the Yucca Mountain Project and the federal government’s efforts to store spent nuclear fuel in Nevada?
Mineral County Survey Respondent
|
Response |
Frequency |
Percent |
Yes |
172 |
83.3 |
No |
37 |
16.6 |
|
 |
Question 1. Are you in favor or opposed to a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada?
Mineral County Survey Respondent
|
Response |
Frequency |
Percent |
In Favor |
124 |
59.3 |
Opposed |
85 |
40.7 |
|

|
Question 2. Increasing energy production requires a permanent geologic repository at Yucca Mountain. It could also reduce the Nation’s energy costs and dependence on foreign energy sources. Knowing this would you be in favor or opposed to a repository?
Mineral County Survey Respondent |
Response |
Frequency |
Percent |
In Favor |
146 |
69.9 |
Opposed |
63 |
30.1 |
|
 |
Question 3. Do you strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose the use of nuclear energy as one of the ways to provide electricity in the United States?
Mineral County Survey Respondent |
Response |
Frequency |
Percent |
Strongly favor |
67 |
32.1 |
Somewhat favor |
72 |
34.4 |
| Somewhat oppose |
32 |
15.3 |
| Strongly oppose |
38 |
18.2 |
In 2008, about 74 percent of national survey respondents favored nuclear energy as one of the ways to provide energy in the United States.
|
 |
Question 4. How confident are you that radioactive waste from America’s nuclear power plants will be transported safely to the Yucca Mountain disposal site. Are you very confident, somewhat confident, not too confident, or not confident at all?
Mineral County Survey Respondent |
Response |
Frequency |
Percent |
Very confident |
63 |
30.1 |
Somewhat confident |
79 |
37.8 |
| Not too confident |
46 |
22.1 |
| Not confident at all |
21 |
10.0 |
|
 |
Question 5. Radioactive waste is transported in rugged vault-like containers, under strict regulations, using cautious procedures, and in collaboration with state agencies. In the past 35 years, there have been more than 3,000 shipments of this radioactive waste across a total of nearly 2 million miles, and no radiation leeks. After hearing this statement, how confident are you that the radioactive waste from America’s nuclear power plants will be transported safely to the proposed Yucca Mountain disposal site?
Mineral County Survey Respondent |
Response |
Frequency |
Percent |
Very confident |
77 |
36.8 |
Somewhat confident |
83 |
39.8 |
| Not too confident |
32 |
15.3 |
| Not confident at all |
17 |
8.1 |
|
 |
Question 6. Please tell me if you strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose or strongly oppose building new nuclear power plants to reduce reliance on oil or coal.
Mineral County Survey Respondent |
Response |
Frequency |
Percent |
Stongly agree |
86 |
41.2 |
Agree |
55 |
26.3 |
| Disagree |
51 |
24.4 |
| Strngly disagree |
17 |
8.1 |
|
 |
Question 7. Should Nevada receive a benefits package or compensation from the federal government, if the Yucca Mountain Project is built?
Mineral County Survey Respondent |
Response |
Frequency |
Percent |
Yes |
202 |
96.7 |
No |
7 |
3.3 |
|
 |
Age of Respondent (survey respondent)
Mineral County Survey Respondent |
Response |
Frequency |
Percent |
Average age |
38 yrs |
|
Median age |
35 yrs |
|
| 55 years or older |
39 |
18.8 |
| 25 to 55 years old |
105 |
50.2 |
| Less than 25 years |
64 |
30.6 |
|
 |
Question 11. Household Size
Mineral County Survey Respondent |
Response |
Frequency |
Percent |
1 person |
43 |
21.0 |
2 person |
66 |
32.2 |
| 3 person |
43 |
21.0 |
| 4 person |
35 |
17.1 |
| More than 4 persons |
18 |
8.7 |
|
 |
Question 12. Length of Residency in Mineral County
Mineral County Survey Respondent |
Response |
Frequency |
Percent |
Average length |
22.9 yrs |
|
Median length |
20 yrs |
|
| 1-10 years |
68 |
32.5 |
| 10-20 years |
70 |
33.5 |
| More than 20 years |
71 |
34.0 |
|
 |
Question 13. Sex of Respondent
Mineral County Survey Respondent |
Response |
Frequency |
Percent |
Male |
84 |
40.2 |
Female |
125 |
59.8 |
|
 |